Section 186 – The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Punishment for false information, concealment, etc., by bankrupt If the bankrupt – (a) knowingly makes a false representation or wilfully omits or conceals any material information while making an application for bankruptcy under section 122 or while providing any information during the bankruptcy process, he shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend […]

Section 185 – The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Punishment for contravention of provisions If an insolvency professional deliberately contravenes the provisions of this Part, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, which shall not be less than one lakh rupees, but may extend to five lakhs rupees, or with both. Practice area’s of B

Section 184 – The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Punishment for false information etc. by creditor in insolvency resolution process (1) If a debtor or creditor provides information which is false in any material particulars to the resolution professional, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to five lakh rupees, or with both.

Section 183 – The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Expeditious disposal of applications Where an application is not disposed of or order is not passed within the period specified in the Code, the Debt Recovery Tribunal or the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be, shall record the reasons for not doing so within the period so specified; and the Chairperson of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, after taking into account the reasons

Section 182 – The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Appeal to Supreme Court (1) An appeal from an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal on a question of law under this Code shall be filed within forty-five days before the Supreme Court. (2) The Supreme Court may, if it is satisfied that a person was prevented by sufficient cause from filing an appeal within forty-five days, allow

Section 181 – The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Appeal to Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (1) An appeal from an order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under this Code shall be filed within thirty days before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. (2) The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal may, if it is satisfied that a person was prevented by sufficient cause from filing an appeal within thirty days, allow the appeal to be

Section 180 – The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Civil court not to have jurisdiction (1) No civil court or authority shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceedings in respect of any matter on which the Debt Recovery Tribunal or the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal has jurisdiction under this Code. (2) No injunction shall be granted by any court, tribunal or authority in respect of any

cost management

Cost management is the process of planning and controlling the costs associated with running a business. It includes collecting, analyzing and reporting cost information to more effectively budget, forecast and monitor costs. Cost management practices can be applied to specific projects or to the company’s overall operating model. Cost management typically focuses on generating savings

Section 179 – The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Adjudicating Authority for individuals and partnership firms (1) Subject to the provisions of section 60, the Adjudicating Authority, in relation to insolvency matters of individuals and firms shall be the Debt Recovery Tribunal having territorial jurisdiction over the place where the individual debtor actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business or personally works for gain and can entertain

Oppression & Mismanagement of Companies Act 2013 – | Section 241-246 |

Section 241-246 of the Companies Act, 2013 lays down the provisions to effectively deal with oppressing and mismanagement in a company. Corporate democracy finds its roots in the concept of majority rule. The principle of majority originated in the rule of Foss v Harbottle which provided that the individual shareholders have no cause of action in law