Section 173 of Income Tax Act, 2025 : Definitions of certain terms relevant to determination of arm’s length price, etc.

In this section and sections 161, 162, 163, 165, 171 and 172, unless the context otherwise requires,—(a) “arm’s length price” means a price which is applied or proposed to be applied in a transaction between persons other than associated enterprises, in uncontrolled conditions;(b) “enterprise” means a person (including a permanent establishment of such person) who […]

Section 178 of Income Tax Act, 2025 : Applicability of General Anti-Avoidance Rule

(1) Irrespective of anything contained in this Act, an arrangement entered into by an assessee may be declared to be an impermissible avoidance arrangement and the consequence in relation to tax arising from it may be determined subject to the provisions of this Chapter.(2) The provisions of this Chapter may be applied to any step

Section 179 of Income Tax Act, 2025 : Impermissible avoidance arrangement.

(1) An impermissible avoidance arrangement means an arrangement, the main purpose of which is to obtain a tax benefit, and it—(a) creates rights, or obligations, which are not ordinarily created between persons dealing at arm’s length;(b) results, directly or indirectly, in the misuse, or abuse, of the provisions of this Act;(c) lacks commercial substance or

Section 180 of Income Tax Act, 2025 : Arrangement to lack commercial substance.

(1) An arrangement shall be deemed to lack commercial substance, if––(a) the substance or effect of the arrangement as a whole, is inconsistent with, or differs significantly from, the form of its individual steps or a part; or(b) it involves or includes—(i) round trip financing; or(ii) an accommodating party; or(iii) elements that have effect of

Section 181 of Income Tax Act, 2025 : Consequences of impermissible avoidance arrangement.

(1) If an arrangement is declared to be an impermissible avoidance arrangement, then, the consequences, in relation to tax, of the arrangement, including denial of tax benefit or a benefit under a tax treaty, shall be determined, in the manner as deemed appropriate.(2) The consequences of an arrangement declared to be an impermissible avoidance arrangement